Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	The "NEW" Right
Date:	4/5/2022 1:01:06 AM

An interesting observation of the Republican party. It is often reflected on the Forum with comments. Obviously, there is a perception among the Right that sex sells.

"Judging by the numbers, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee are obsessed with child  pornography.

In four days of Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, the phrase “child porn” (or “pornography” or “pornographer”) was mentioned 165 times. There were also, according to transcripts, 142 uses of “sex” (“sexual abuse,” “sexual assault,” “sexual intercourse,” “sex crimes”), 15 of “pedophile,” 13 of “predators,” 18 of “prepubescent” and nine of general pornography.

There were only 30 mentions of the First Amendment and 12 of the Bill of Rights."

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	The "NEW" Left
Date:	4/5/2022 8:43:16 AM

Democrats want to indoctrinate young children in deviant sexual behaviors.  Democrats like when LGBTQ... people groom young children.  Democrats like to ruin children's lives with puberty blockers and surgery.  Democrats like Judge Brown don't think pedophilia and child sexual abuse are all that bad and she feels sorry for the offenders and gives them light sentences.  So should the American people understand the kind of person she is?  He!! yes and I thank Republicans for making that point over and over again!  Should the American people see once again the kind of people Democrats approve of and propose for such an important position?  You bet your a$$ I do.  

So what you think is some kind of clever slam Goofy is the exact opposite.  You too have noticed that the Republican Senators are doing their job in exposing the depravity of the left as exemplified in this judge.  I for one am glad of that despite your pathetic spin on why the focus on her abhorrent record.  And just to put a final nail in your stupid coffin on this, I can assure you that investigators of child sex crimes, prosecutors of child sex crimes and judges of child sex crimes say all these same words all day long. And weep at the sickness in our society.

You just keep being you Goofy....the useful idiot of the Democrat party.  

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	The "NEW" Left
Date:	4/5/2022 8:52:37 AM (updated 4/5/2022 9:00:05 AM)

Seems to approve of Pedos, child rape, child porn and the light sentences of those same ( and drug dealers, illegals and other criminals ).

Never would have thought you would have come out in favor of child abuse - but your post pretty much makes it clear that you feel that holding criminals responsible for their actions and getting people who prey on children off the streets is just another joke to you or somehow in your mind it is a negative against people who want to protect children.  It amazes me, when you make such statements that I often wonder if you can not really believe what you post - but the evidence is right there.

So I will happily wear it as a badge of honor that you lump many of us on the "right" in with people who would like to make sure that people who go light on pedos, child pornographers and people who harm children and try to keep someone off the highest court in the land that literally apologizes to people who traffic children and images of them(and go on to be repeat offenders and thank the judge for going light on them so that they can continue their actions.  

Just when I think that your depravity can really not go any lower you really amaze me with at the depths that evil people can go.

You bring up the constitution and the 1st amendment and how little it was mentioned - from what I saw of the hearings - she could not define any of them or offer any opinion on that either - just like she could not even define what a woman is.  If she can not figure out the important things, I do not trust her with the constitution, bill of rights or anything else. 

Obviously, there is a perception among the Left that child sex sells.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	I will give you one thing Goofy
Date:	4/5/2022 8:58:20 AM

I can agree that one Republican falls into your observation and that is none other than Mitt Romney.  Mittens will now vote for her confirmation despite his no vote several months ago to a lower court.  And literally the only thing new we know about the judge is her soft on pedophilia rulings, her apologizing to baby rapers that she has to send them to prison and her freeing sexual deviants in contradiction to sentencing guidelines. 

So indeed there is one Republican that shares her perspective and that is Mitt Romney, RINO Senatory from Utah.  Someone the left admires.  How appropos.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	The "NEW" Left
Date:	4/5/2022 9:02:10 AM

Here's why they rarely came up.  They already know she will vote against free speech and the right to bear arms.  They already know she will be in lockstep with Kagan and Sotomoyor.  Why ask questions they already know the answer to or follow up questions when she won't answer the first one?  When you have a judge that refuses to define what a woman is you already know everything you need to know about how she is going to rule on cases.  The things that Goofy thinks are important, no one can understand.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	The "NEW" Left
Date:	4/5/2022 9:04:17 AM

sadly he is as lock step with them as they are - and if he belives what he posts hopefully the rest of his family is keeping an eye on him for his own safety ( and others ) 

https://nypost.com/2022/04/03/rapist-gets-lax-sentence-from-jackson-then-nabbed-for-sex-assault/?utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=NYPTwitter

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	I will give you one thing Goofy....THANKS
Date:	4/5/2022 11:26:36 AM

MM, you have your head in the sand. She is a leftist and the  judges that Trump nominated are conservatives. We all know how they will vote just  as we know how Jackson will  vote. You make a big a deal because  she will not support your views.

You  have an issue with  our form of government...a Putin style where only your opinion  rules would suit you  just fine...Trump and a SC of nine Conservatives...Too bad, you and your kind can't accept that  we are a diverse country.

I  find your logic amusing.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	That you would thank me is not a surprise
Date:	4/5/2022 12:12:29 PM

Now that's another weird comment from you.  Her being approved was a foregone conclusion since Harry Reid nuked the judicial confirmation process.  My take is that not one Republican should have voted for her confirmation given what we know not just about her judicial philosophy but because she is soft on probably the most heinous crime of all other than murder.  That Democrats would vote for a protector of pedophiles is not even remotely debatable.  There were plenty of qualified leftist jurists that Dementia Joe could have nominated but the leftist child groomers really wanted her.....and he put her up knowing she is a pedophile enabler.  That's what ordinary Americans with a shred of decency need to know and understand.  For people like you, her letting pedophiles go was probably a resumer enhancer.  I suppose given your penchant for posting porn on this website you may have a personal reason for supporting her.....me, not so much.