Forum Thread
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,143 messages
Updated 4/25/2024 7:30:23 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,605 messages
Updated 4/25/2024 9:33:24 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,169 messages
Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Martin Photo Gallery





    
Name:   lotowner - Email Member
Subject:   "Don't Spend Your SS Increase for 2011"
Date:   10/10/2010 7:46:03 PM

WASHINGTON – As if voters don't have enough to be angry about this election year, the government is expected to announce this week that more than 58 million Social Security recipients will go through another year without an increase in their monthly benefits.

It would mark only the second year without an increase since automatic adjustments for inflation were adopted in 1975. The first year was this year.





Name:   GoneFishin - Email Member
Subject:   "Don't Spend Your SS Increase for 2011"
Date:   10/10/2010 8:15:37 PM

This is a good sign that inflation remains under control since the SS annual increase is tied to the Cost of Living increase. I assume those on the Right support this, as I do.



Name:   MrHodja - Email Member
Subject:   "Don't Spend Your SS Increase for 2011"
Date:   10/10/2010 8:44:11 PM

If indeed it doesn't cost more to live, then a cost of living increase is not warranted.  But I wonder if the cost of living is based in part on the cost of a jar of mayonnaise.  Went to Super Wally World the other day to pick up a few things and picked up a "quart" jar of mayo....or at least what used to be a quart.  Someone needs to tell Hellman's that a quart is 32 ounces, not 30, as evidenced by the label on the "quart" jar.

So, if no inflation is based on less product for the same price, maybe the seniors are indeed getting $crewed.  Then again, if the measure is fair, maybe not.

How's that for a wild and uncontrolled rant from an "extreme right wing nut", golf floxtrot?

:>)

Nasreddin Hodja

By the way, in your opinion is O'Donnell worse for the country than the Marxist....uh.... Democrat alternative?



Name:   comrade - Email Member
Subject:   "Don't Spend Your SS Increase for 2011"
Date:   10/10/2010 9:23:15 PM


GF's chooses to look at this development as "good news": inflation is under control.


I must agree with you Hodja. The flip side of the GF gambit is there is no money to pay for an increase (until the GAO doctors the numbers and Obama directs the Treasury to print more.) What's more, we all know how much further our dollars go today than just 2 years ago at the last increase, so it would be just greedy to even entertain the thought of getting to keep more of the money already paid in to Social Security.
At the end of November the New World Order and Medicare will also have to contend with mandated cuts to doctor reimbursements for most all Medicare services - numbers that now are close to 25% across the board; so that will really be a boon to the giant tote sheet and make the BigO look good on paper - and there will probably be less eyes to puruse those papers (Good - less potential criticism) as the population finds a new steady state with socialized medicine.



Name:   water_watcher - Email Member
Subject:   oh fishy
Date:   10/10/2010 9:41:19 PM

It reflects the economy id in the toilet and the failed policies of Obama have made things worse with fears of disinflation like Japan that takes decades to dig out of with high unemployment.  Oh year, it is a good thing. 

Another blind remark you made ... all why your party is proposing a new retiement age of 70 and reduced benefits.   Of course with the destruction Obama and the other liberals have created, most people will have to work until 70 or later for survival.  That will really help unemployment ... increasing the retirement age.



Name:   water_watcher - Email Member
Subject:   oh fishy
Date:   10/10/2010 9:41:28 PM

It reflects the economy id in the toilet and the failed policies of Obama have made things worse with fears of disinflation like Japan that takes decades to dig out of with high unemployment.  Oh year, it is a good thing. 

Another blind remark you made ... all why your party is proposing a new retiement age of 70 and reduced benefits.   Of course with the destruction Obama and the other liberals have created, most people will have to work until 70 or later for survival.  That will really help unemployment ... increasing the retirement age.



Name:   MrHodja - Email Member
Subject:   Chirp, chirp
Date:   10/10/2010 9:43:40 PM

I just wish GF would enlighten us with regard to the "good" the current administration is doing.  All we get is cheap-shot criticism of the right.  I've asked repeatedly what GF thinks the left is doing that is good for our country and all I hear is crickets....chirp....chirp...

Nasreddin Hodja



Name:   MAJ USA RET - Email Member
Subject:   Chip Once for YES - Twice for NO
Date:   10/11/2010 9:08:46 AM

Whatever happens… including cuts in Social Security (which is a Ponzi scheme about to go bad) and Medicare… there is much pain to come.  ONLY fiscal austerity will save our great nation.  We will go the way of rioting Greece, and now France, unless we put a halt to the exploding debt and underfunded entitlements.  The longer we delay the pain the worse it will be.

 

Am I wrong?  Watch Illinois (unrecoverable without Federal bailout) and California (in critical condition).  The golden geese are taxpayers, small business, and big corporation.  So, how did the California geese handle it?  The fleeced geese fled if they could (hmmm… mixed metaphor).  Those that did not are being bled dry.  There’s no more money to be had to support the bloated entitlement situation.  Now, there will be fiscal pain in California… or the rest of the country will bail them out.

 

Fishy, should we bail out California and Illinois?  Not a complex question – answer is “yes” or “no”.





Name:   MAJ USA RET - Email Member
Subject:   Chip Once for YES - Twice for NO
Date:   10/11/2010 9:26:46 AM

ONE CHIRP – Yes, bail them out, we can’t afford to have states fail because of their unfettered fiscal policies.  We, that worked hard, should share the fruits of our labor to bolster the failed policies of entitlement states.  Only higher taxes can fund them – raise ours.  Redistribute wealth - share the pain of irresponsible behavior.

 

TWO CHIRPS – No, behavior is a result of its consequences.  If we bail them out, their debt will expand to fill the windfall.  Therefore, we require that they cut entitlements (pain) and bloated government.  We expect them to regard and respond to illegal immigration for what it is.  We expect them to respect the sources of their money – taxpayers. 

 

As go California and Illinois, so goes the United States of America.





Name:   Mack - Email Member
Subject:   Just Waiting
Date:   10/11/2010 8:11:02 PM

for the outfall of insane fiscal policy to arrive on the doorstep. And, it will. Just starting.
Just hope that mid-terms can at least restrict the spending spree in the District of Corruption enough to prevent an even more damaging 2011.

The current economic and political turmoil is causing a serious corrosion of TRUST in my country, and, I don't like it, at all, at all. At this point, I don't trust anybody on a ballot sheet, and polls show that I am not alone, Republican or Democrat.
Ripe ground for reactionary movement.
I have already apologized to my children for the mess I have left them to resolve.



 





Name:   lotowner - Email Member
Subject:   "Walking Away from Prescriptions"
Date:   10/13/2010 8:29:40 AM

GF - I cam't imagine why these people do not pick up their prescriptions. Cost is level so there is no need for a COL for SS in 2011.

wsjlogo.gif

Growing numbers of Americans with health insurance are walking away from their prescriptions at the pharmacy counter, the latest indication that efforts to contain costs may be curbing health-care consumption.

A review of insurance-claims data shows that so-called abandonment -- when a patient refuses to purchase or pick up a prescription that was filled and packaged by a pharmacist -- was up 55% in the second quarter of this year, compared with four years earlier.

The phenomenon coincides with rising co-payments for many drugs and increasing enrollment in high-deductible insurance plans that require patients to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars out of pocket before insurance kicks in.

Patients are deserting prescriptions for the most expensive drugs most often, according to the review by Wolters Kluwer Pharma Solutions, a health-care data company. For instance, nearly one in 10 new prescriptions for brand-name drugs were abandoned by people with commercial health plans in the quarter, up 88% from four years earlier, when the data were first tracked and before the recession began. Abandonment of generic drugs was higher, too, according to the data









Quick Links
Lake Martin News
Lake Martin Photos
Lake Martin Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeMartin.com
THE LAKE MARTIN WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal