Forum Thread
(Lake Tuscaloosa Specific)
11 messages
Updated 11/6/2023 3:02:24 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,623 messages
Updated 5/13/2024 10:35:33 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Tuscaloosa Specific)
6 messages
Updated 6/30/2008 7:08:16 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Tuscaloosa Photo Gallery





    
Name:   MAJ USA RET - Email Member
Subject:   The Constitution
Date:   1/6/2011 9:11:13 AM


Once again, if anyone on this forum would like their own copy of the Constitution, you may download it from my website:

 

http://www.mrandolphmason.com/Our_Constitution.doc

 





Name:   Yankee06 - Email Member
Subject:   congrress reads The Constitution
Date:   1/6/2011 8:15:32 PM

-I can't believe the new republican house has alreaady failed. It wanted to read the Constitution at its opening session, --great idea. It read an amended version, --leaving out the 3/5 th clause, ---bad idea. -I don't know about y'all, but I don't want either party screwing around with history. Tell it like it was then, cuz that's why it is the way it is now! -I can't believe I find myself agreeing with congressman Jackson: Here's the article: Should Congress Have Read the WHOLE Constitution? Jesse Jackson, Jr. Makes the Case By Chris Good Jan 6 2011, 2:06 PM ET 3 Members of the House, for the first time anyone can remember, read the Constitution aloud on the House floor to commemorate the beginning of a new Congress, one day after the 435 members were sworn in. But they didn't read the whole Constitution, exactly: They read the document as amended. That left out, among other things, the three-fifths clause, which deemed slaves less than full people for population-counting purposes and was only eliminated by the Thirteenth Amendment and the abolition of slavery. Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr., objected this morning on the House floor, and later today repeated his complaints in a written statement released by his office: ... Our expectation was that the new Republican majority would read the Constitution as written and its subsequent amendments. There is a broad body of law and interpretation that has developed from 1787 until the adoption of the last Amendment in 1992 that has turned our Constitution into a living document, paid for by the blood, sweat and tears of millions of Americans from the Revolutionary War, through the Civil War to even our current conflicts. "The new Republican majority and their redacted Constitutional reading gives little deference to the long history of improving the Constitution and only seeks an interpretation of our Constitution based on the now, not the historic, broad body of law and struggle that it has taken to get there. It leaves out the need to continue to refine the Constitution so that we have a more perfect union. ...



Name:   Talullahhound - Email Member
Subject:   congrress reads The Constitution
Date:   1/6/2011 9:52:49 PM

First Mark Twain and now the Constitution... where will it end?



Name:   MrHodja - Email Member
Subject:   congrress reads The Constitution
Date:   1/6/2011 10:43:15 PM

YGTBSM.  I used the word kuweer in a post and the forum PC police got me - wouldn't post it...although it was totally in context and not a slur against anyone.  Jeezypeezy what has this world come to?

Nasreddin Hodja



Name:   lotowner - Email Member
Subject:   The Constitution vs Imminent Domain
Date:   1/7/2011 6:29:16 AM


Maybe, the Supreme Court should do the same reading annualy.


Imminent Domain and How This Law Can Affect Your Rights As US Citizens

In June of 2005, the Supreme Court ruled on a case commonly known as: Kelo vs New London, Connecticut. The result of this ruling sets a precedence that the Federal, State and City government can take property from one private citizen and give it to another private citizen.

The basics of the ruling says that if another citizen, such as a powerful developer can generate more tax dollars for the government with your property than you can, they have a right to that property. This is a gross misrepresentation of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution which states that “ Government cannot seize personal property for public use  from a private citizen without just compensation.”

The key here is that the land must be for public use and for the betterment of the public. In no way does it say that the land can be taken and given to another private citizen to generate tax dollars. This puts every landowner at risk of losing their land and liberty at the whim of the rich.

Though it is true that if the government takes your property, they must reimburse you a fair price, but the fair price you are given is rarely adequate. Often you are given an amount far below what you could get for the property if it were put on the market.  This together with the fact that your property is being taken from you and sold to private developers is one of the biggest infringements on your rights as American citizens to date.

This is yet, just another stumbling block in our society that aids in keeping the poor in poverty and helping the rich to become even more prosperous. The American Dream of the pursuit of Life, Liberty and Justice is slowly being stolen by corrupt politicians and the power elite. In the United States the middle class is fast disappearing and the division between the “haves and the have-nots” is becoming increasingly large.

By ignoring what is happening today, not only do we risk our freedom and liberties, but those of future generations as well.

It is the citizens of this country that will have to watch their elected officials and if they are not doing their jobs, as well as following the Constitution of the United States, get rid of them on the next election. Don’t blindly vote for someone because they are part of a certain political party, research that person and find out for yourself what they stand for. It is your country and your responsibility to keep it a Free Country.  If the people of this country are not very careful they may someday find themselves ruled by the power elite, while they toil for what may easily be taken away from them.





Name:   Yankee06 - Email Member
Subject:   The Constitution vs Imminent Domain
Date:   1/7/2011 8:23:16 AM

Lot, -I was wondering what brought this Supreme Court travesty to your attention today. This particular ruling has not sat well with me since it was rendered. I rank it with the worst, if not THE worst (Scott?), the Court has ever made. -This ruling has had its adverse impact in other little guy vs big guy cases, but,as far as I know, has always held. -Here's the final nail, after chasing out all the home owners, the 2005 land rush went bust. The development never took place. You can drive by the area today (or at least last year) and the land is empty except for one small house. The home owners were forced out; the developers went bankrupt; the land is not being used; ---and, drum roll please, the city is not receiving any taxes from teh land!







Quick Links
Lake Tuscaloosa News
Lake Tuscaloosa Photos
Lake Tuscaloosa Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeTuscaloosa.info
THE LAKE TUSCALOOSA WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal