Name:	Shortbus -	Reply
Subject:	Hillary (in jail) 2016
Date:	3/5/2015 4:49:38 PM

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/414886/did-hillary-clinton-violate-federal-embezzlement-law-andrew-c-mccarthy

... the embezzlement statute (Section 641 of the federal penal code – Title 18) may also be relevant. Embezzlement generally refers to the theft of money, but the federal statute extends the concept to cover government records and other property as well. Specifically, the statute makes it a crime, punishable by up to 10 years’ imprisonment, for anyone (does not have to be a custodian or even a government official) to embezzle, steal, purloin or knowingly convert for the use of herself or others “any record … or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof.” It similarly criminalizes the receipt, concealment or retention of such embezzled or purloined government records. Under federal law, emails constituting government business conducted by government officials are government records. 

...Much has justifiably been said today about the importance of issuing subpoenas to compel production of Mrs. Clinton’s private email records. That should only be the beginning of the investigation. It takes a great deal of time and effort to maintain, service, repair and operate servers. Who was involved in that project? Who had access? And who knew about the external email system and facilitated its operation? As secretary of state, Clinton was surrounded by several longtime aides, including Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan and Huma Abedin. Mills and Sullivan have already been implicated by a witness in a scheme to purge embarrassing documents from the materials the State Department provided to Mrs. Clinton’s hand-picked Accountability Review Board that investigated security lapses surrounding the 2012 Benghazi massacre. It is known, moreover, that then-Secretary Clinton created an ethically dubious arrangement that allowed Abedin to work for private clients – at a Clinton-connected consulting firm – while remaining on the State Department payroll as a top adviser.

Name:	Talullahhound -	Reply
Subject:	Hillary (in jail) 2016
Date:	3/5/2015 6:23:57 PM

I'm not a lawyer, but I think you would have to squint pretty hard to apply that particular statue to the Hilary Clinton email situation.  I'm not defending Hiliary, because I think what she did fails the regulartory standard for communication by public officials, but I don't think this particular statue applies here.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	Ron Fournier gets it
Date:	3/6/2015 9:04:23 AM

I actually read him on a semi-regular basis as he is one of the few intellectually honest liberals at National Journal.  This one is spot on and pretty damning.  He better get a food tester and armed security because he might end up committing "suicide" by shooting himself in the back of the head and then relocating his body to a deserted park somewhere.

http://www.nationaljournal.com/twenty-sixteen/hillary-clinton-still-doesn-t-get-it-20150305

Name:	Talullahhound -	Reply
Subject:	Ron Fournier gets it
Date:	3/6/2015 4:19:18 PM

I agree.  It's hard not to agree that all the emails relating to her job should have been on the State server.   She knew what she was doing.  And day now, she'll say something like "it depends on what your definition of "is" is".  The Clintons have always believed that there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get them.  I guess it makes them feel important.

Name:	Shortbus -	Reply
Subject:	hillary-conspired-to-break-the-law
Date:	3/26/2015 1:19:01 PM

http://www.infowars.com/napolitano-hillary-conspired-to-break-the-law/

Name:	Shortbus -	Reply
Subject:	hillary-racketeering
Date:	3/26/2015 5:04:51 PM (updated 3/26/2015 5:07:19 PM)

 http://www.tpnn.com/2015/03/25/hillary-hit-with-racketeering-lawsuit/

Name:	Shortbus -	Reply
Subject:	hillary-racketeering
Date:	8/11/2015 7:27:02 PM

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article30714762.html