Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   Really? Date:   9/8/2015 9:45:08 PM

C'mon Hound, your critical thinking is not working here. If they heavily redact a document that was on her unsecured server one might have wonder why. Could it be it contains classified information, perhaps?  And that is exactly the point. She violated the rules and most likely the law by having classified information, and we now know from the NY Times, top secret information about NK's nuclear program on her unsecured server sitting in a damn closet in her bathroom in her house. I just can't figure out why this doesn't bother you, especially since I know you are no fan of Hillary. Petraus has to plea bargain for having classified info in his safe at his house. One with an ounce of intellectual honesty would think what Hillary did was ten times worse. And yet you seem to think all she will get is fined. And to think Nixon had to resign the presidency for covering up a third rate burglary. How far our standards have fallen.