Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   You know Woodrow Date:   1/1/2016 9:53:33 AM

You state these things as if they are fact when they are not.  This whole warmest year on record thing is a total joke because it is false in the first place and stupid in the second place.  How long have we been keeping "records" on global climates and by what methodology?  Have you even looked at the estimates from ice core data?  How do you explain the periods that were warmer than the last decade?  What about the warming period in the Middle Ages?  What were the highest temperatures then?  How do we know?  Why is it that best data set we have from satellites have shown no appreciable warming for the last nearly two decades?  You see Archie, you cannot see beyond the lies you are being told and do your own research yet you are quick to impugn any source that doesn't agree with your false religion.

You admit that the models were wildly wrong for the last two decades, at least the ones that wrongly predicted warming as CO2 levels rise.  I will agree that the models that predicted no warming were correct, but of course that undermines the slavish desire to connect CO2 to climate change.  Despite all this you can't connect the dots and have even a shred of skepticism.

You act as if limiting carbon can be done pain free.  Give up carbon for a year and if you are still alive you can lecture us.  I recommend the book Cool It by Bjorn Lomborg, who by the way is another true believer in ACC.  If you think limiting carbon is the road to happiness you are simply sharing with us your invincible ignorance.  Read the book, it is well researched and well referenced.

And finally, 1933 was the warmest year on record.  More data manipulation to fool the gullible.  But hey, if you can get them to regurgitate the lies on a forum and act like they are fact it is mission accomplished.  All good hoaxes need the useful idiots.  Good job Arch!