(Lake Naomi Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
83,623 messages
Updated 5/13/2024 10:35:33 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Naomi Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Yankee06
|
Subject:
|
MAGI? Archy
|
Date:
|
11/2/2009 8:49:43 PM
|
|
Archy, -Reference your "MAGI" post above, ....now I'm really confused. -I haven't been on this forum all that long, but up to this point, I kind of got the idea that you lean a little to the left, and are "OK" with taxing the upper middle and upper classes in order to insure economic fairness for those less fortunate. -But in your MAGI post above, you wrote: "... I also would expect he is wise enough to shelter a lot of his income. ....I myself am thankful and amazed each year when I see how much less my MAGI is than what I actually make..." -Hmmmm, am I understanding you to say that you are "OK" with taxing the wealthy, ..and that you are "OK" with weath transfer, .....but only as believed by the Geitner-Daschle school of economics which apparently says that it is only "OK" to excessively tax conservatives, who, paradoxically, don't believe in excessive taxes; ..but it is "NOT OK" to excessively tax liberals, who, paradoxically, "DO" believe in excessive taxation. - h-m-m-m-m-m--mmmmmmmmm, do you see how I might be confused?
|
|