(Lake Naomi Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
83,627 messages
Updated 5/20/2024 12:16:20 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Naomi Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Yankee06
|
Subject:
|
Inevitable
|
Date:
|
1/14/2011 1:40:16 AM
|
|
-What always amazed me about my contacts with some senators and house members when I worked in Washington was my perception of their lack of professionalism or at least their lack of logic in the professional positions they took. If I were as unprofessional in my military business as they were in their legislative business, I would have been fired or I would have resigned from shame.
-These responses to Tucson by some congress people are more examples; ban certain symbols and words; no guns within a 1000 feet, no 30-round clips, etc. They are all a result of flawed logic.
-Let's look at this latest 30-round clip proposal. This nutjob in Tucson had a 30-round clip and killed 6 people. The nutjob at Fort Hood did not have 30-round clips but he killed 13 and wounded a lot more. So is there any real logic to the banning of 30-round clips as to teh number of people a nutjob is going to kill? Two guns or a little practice reloading seems to negate the purpose of such a law!
-now if teh agenda is to use this event to incrementally take away gun rights, then banning 30-round clips might be a logical long-term approach.
-Would banning guns altogether, keep guns out of teh hands of criminals?--NO. Would bannig guns altogether keep guns out of the hands of nutjobs? --probably it would keep them out of teh hands of alot of nut jobs. Now that's a debate to have, --but not 30-round clips. That debate is just stupid!
|
|