Name:   Council Rock Doc - Subject:   ANOTHER sincere and serious question Date:   4/4/2016 2:52:38 PM

1. you walk a slippery and defining step when you state that just because a human life is unwanted or unable to be taken care of, it is     better off dead.

2. We certainly all agree that there are different degrees of legal injustice.  Violence is considered by most the worst and killing the         worst of all.

  Hence, there must also exist different categories of an innocent victim.  Who do you think warrants the higher claim to protection?       Your and my answer to this question probably differs; I would say the small and helpless and early life the highest of all.

3.  You say the the Pro-Life movement is rooted in religion.  Yes in part, but would you not agree that the MINIMUM purpose of GOVERNMENT would be to shield the weak, no matter what race, religion, ethnicity, sex, or income bracket from abuse by the strong? That is certainly what Democrats currently espouse.    Who would be considered weaker than the unborn child?  It is incorrect to say that government has no stated function in this debate.

4.  Only a very limited number of people are ever brave enough to stand on the side of an unpopular cause.  Consider me one in this instance.....because what is more outrageous  than fatal violence against the most helpless members of our human community.  This is the issue that should be at the forefront of political discourse, not the distraction that has evolved discussing who might be worthy of punishment.