Off-Topic: Ban The Ban Ban
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,143 messages
Updated 4/25/2024 7:30:23 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,605 messages
Updated 4/25/2024 9:33:24 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,169 messages
Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Martin Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   lakngulf The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Ban The Ban Ban
Date:   3/16/2017 9:42:09 AM

I am betwitxt and between on the travel slowdown.  I think administrative actions can take care of most of what they are trying to do.

Also, if it is for 90 days to fix our vetting, perhaps we fix our vetting instead of issuing the ban.

But on a more important note:  A judge CANNOT make a ruling with this reasoining.....

this is a religious ban, even though it explicity states otherwise.

this would be an ok ban if someone else was president.

I have to rule on this based on campaign rhetoric!

 

What????

Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Ban The Ban Ban - lakngulf - 3/16/2017 9:42:09 AM
     Ban The Ban Ban - Talullahhound - 3/16/2017 11:26:21 AM



Quick Links
Lake Martin News
Lake Martin Photos
Lake Martin Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeMartin.com
THE LAKE MARTIN WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal