Name:   CRD - Subject:   So bottom line after much verbosity is Date:   12/7/2020 6:45:04 PM

So sorry that I used big words and long sentences Archie.  I will attempt to simplify things for you here.  Early on, individuals like Fauci and Birx and the team that Trump assembled had the "most experience" with viral pandemics and were all that anyone could hang their hat on.  But if you remember when it was suggested that ibuprofen not be used to treat fevers with COVID, it was soon debunked as individuals gained experience with this disease.  

Good science, which includes the ability to replicate and is subject to peer review TAKES TIME.  If an individual, with sterling credentials similar to Birx and Fauci, (not me) disagree with their interpretation and reaction to good science and data, why do you consider that throwing someone under the bus?  Disagreements in science occur all the time. Birx may have been accurate early on, but again, I consider her irrelevant now.  That is the product of scientific and social scrutiny that has occurred over the past 8 months.  You tend to look for a problem that does not exist Archie.