Salamonie Lake Topics: Answering a question...
(Salamonie Lake Specific)
1 messages
Updated 6/6/2011 8:42:34 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,609 messages
Updated 5/2/2024 5:30:02 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Salamonie Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Salamonie Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   longtimer The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Answering a question...
Date:   6/17/2007 11:34:51 PM

I was catching up on several pages worth of posts, and came across the following question: "WHY CAN'T MARTIN BE A FLOW OF THE RIVER LAKE LIKE MITCHELL AND LAY?"

Surprisingly, no one ever answered the question, which was posed by someone with the clever-esque handle of Kizma Anuice. (Who wants to bet that Kizma "rules the school?")

Anyway, here is the answer:

Yes, Lay Lake and Lake Mitchell are what is known as "run of the river" lakes; Lake Martin, in contrast, is an impoundment, or reservoir.

Run of the river lakes release the water about as fast as it comes into the lake; the water flows into the lake, through the turbines, and on downstream.

Reservoirs hold the water, and release it later as need be. There can be releases for hydroelectric generation, flood control, downstream water management, environmental reasons, and so on; the important thing to remember is that the water is held back for a time.

So how is the lake affected by its status as either a run of the river lake, or a reservoir? Take a look at these links, all maps of run of the river lakes in Alabama:

Lay Lake: http://www.laylake.info/Nav3.asp
Lake Mitchell: http://www.lakemitchell.info/Nav3.asp
Yates Lake: http://yates.uslakes.info/Nav3.asp

Now compare those to our own Lake Martin: http://www.lakemartin.com/Nav3.asp

Can you see the difference?

The bottom line is this: were the Power Company to decide to give Kizma what he wants, Martin Dam would hold LESS water back. In short order, the shores of Lake Martin would be very close to what the shores of the Tallapoosa River were before the dam was built. Everything west of the Dixie Sailing Club would not longer be anywhere near the water, and a good portion of what now lies east of the main channel would dry up, as well.

If you want to visualize what "run of the river Lake Martin" would look like, take a current map of the lake, locate the river channel, and trace it with a nice fat magic marker. The path made by the magic marker would represent the waters of Lake Martin.

Now, Kizma, is that really what you want?
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Answering a question... - longtimer - 6/17/2007 11:34:51 PM
     Answering an answer - Kizma Anuice - 6/18/2007 7:25:06 AM
          Answering with facts - longtimer - 6/18/2007 11:42:20 AM
               Answering with facts - 8hcap - 6/18/2007 12:06:15 PM
                    Does it matter? - longtimer - 6/18/2007 1:26:02 PM
               Answering with facts - MythBuster - 6/18/2007 1:11:01 PM
     Answering a question... - Pontoonfisher - 6/18/2007 4:56:51 PM
          Good point Pontoonfisher.... - babygirl - 6/18/2007 5:38:03 PM



Quick Links
Salamonie Lake News
Salamonie Lake Photos
Salamonie Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
Salamonie.LakesOnline.com
THE SALAMONIE LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal