Lake Martin Topics: 100 Foot Restriction
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,144 messages
Updated 4/30/2024 5:16:38 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,606 messages
Updated 4/30/2024 9:09:31 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,169 messages
Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Martin Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   MartiniMan The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   100 Foot Restriction
Date:   6/3/2008 10:01:25 AM

My main point is that common sense and common courtesy through boater education is the key, not a new law. I still maintain that it would have been unenforceable and that it will only be used to prosecute in the event of an accident. When we pull tubes or skiers/wakeboarders we stay away from the shore and docks and frankly 100 feet would be too close even for me.

My main fear with a law like this is that what happened to me once will become a regular occurrence. We were in a larger area of Sandy Creek and there were two boats tied up together in the middle of the area. We were pulling tubes and they waved us over and asked us to go elsewhere because our waves were bouncing them around. I moved to another area out of courtesy but it still bothers me that they had this sense of entitlement to anchor in the middle and not be bothered by waves. It is the same sense of entitlement that I see with people and their piers on open areas of the lake complaining about waves. A lake has boats, boats make waves, piers and docking systems can be designed to handle it. If people don't take proper precautions then the occasional inconsiderate boater will cause damage.

With a law like this, people will be filing complaints left and right claiming someone came within 100 feet, they will be staking out in areas where it will be impossible to pass by them except at idle. Think about it, if they were anchored in the middle of a 400' wide area with piers on either side by this law you theoretically would have to idle when you go past them (unless it is exempt). This will create all sorts of conflict that can be avoided by common sense and common courtesy.
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
100 Foot Restriction - fountain - 6/2/2008 4:56:11 PM
     100 Foot Restriction - MartiniMan - 6/2/2008 5:43:00 PM
          100 Foot Restriction - DJ - 6/2/2008 5:57:32 PM
          "Common Courtesy" - Mack - 6/2/2008 6:28:51 PM
               "Common Sense" - Thomas Paine - 6/2/2008 8:18:14 PM
               Exactly...Its Common Courtesy - solvacc - 6/2/2008 9:50:38 PM
          100 Foot Restriction - water_watcher - 6/2/2008 9:37:24 PM
          100 Foot Restriction - nelems,robert - 6/2/2008 10:23:54 PM
     100 Foot Restriction - peruecreek - 6/2/2008 10:29:28 PM
          100 Foot Restriction - water_watcher - 6/3/2008 6:09:14 AM
               100 Foot Restriction - AUCATZ - 6/3/2008 9:11:05 AM
     100 Foot Restriction - MartiniMan - 6/3/2008 10:01:25 AM
          100 Foot Restriction - RatherBeSkiing - 6/3/2008 11:53:54 AM
               100' restriction could've been - solvacc - 6/3/2008 1:12:22 PM
                    100' restriction could've been - MartiniMan - 6/3/2008 3:17:42 PM
                    100' restriction could've been - boataholic - 6/3/2008 3:48:07 PM
          100 Foot Restriction - Mack - 6/3/2008 6:22:04 PM



Quick Links
Lake Martin News
Lake Martin Photos
Lake Martin Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeMartin.com
THE LAKE MARTIN WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal